Freedom of Speech, Terms and Conditions Applied

This could well be called a sequel to my previous article “Death of the Idea of India“. Aggrieved as much we are by the steady decline of secular discourse in the country, a new situation stares us in the face. The last time i know of something of this kind happened in India, was in the 1970s. State has no business meddling in individual affairs. However, the Government of India wishes to do exactly that. Kapil Sibal, honourable Minister in charge of Telecom, announced plans to regulate contents that are posted by users on the web space.

Minister of Telecom

Courtesy Liveindia dot Com

This indeed is a dangerous proposition. The State overrides the individual’s authority to free thought and expression only in communist or autocratic nations. India is neither. The latest example of curbs on social media use among global communities was seen in China, Egypt and Syria. None of these nations are a democracy. But naturally, this decision met with a lot of outrage online (some outpourings on Twitter kind of justified the need for pre-screening, though).

Offence is relative. One man’s poison is another man’s honey! State censorship does not go down well with the foundations that the idea of India is laid on. Regulation can (and should) be left to the better judgment of an individual. Abusive, inappropriate or offensive contents can be blocked or reported about in any social network. Why does the State want to step into the fray?

Having criticised the state for faltering in its policy, it is opportune that  i turn my attention to the people who cried their hearts out to defend their freedom of expression. How easily we mistake rights to be absolute and stay almost confounded about Fundamental Duties. Quite clearly, freedom of expression and speech comes with a rider. Restrictions on “freedom” can be imposed for the sake of public order, security of State, decency or morality. (But that is for the social websites to do and government must not meddle in that).

Narendra Modi

Holier than Thou NaMo - courtesy Bharatwaves dot com

What amuses me the most is, some proponents and endorsers of bans in the past, stuck their necks out yesterday to contest this decision by GoI. Some known for their rabid support to those who hounded an artist out of this country, some known for their own history of “censorship” actions as administrative heads of state. The hypocrisy was spilling over the cup and was not only distasteful but obnoxiously unpalatable. Freedom is a matter of convenience for us. We choose to support freedom of opinion when someone agrees with me. Or else, you are doomed to be silenced.

So, dear readers, if you find this article too offensive for your neurons in the Amygdala to digest, feel free to register your freedom of expression of dissent in the comments section. I shall reserve my freedom to screen the contents that can appear in my domain😉

About Agnivo Niyogi

Typical Aantel, reader, blogger, news addict, opinionated. Digital media enthusiast. Didi fanboi. Joy Bangla!

Posted on December 7, 2011, in Politics, Social Issues and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 8 Comments.

  1. Another interesting article by +Agnivo Niyogi On Internet freedom and abrupt and motion by the Governments to curb it!!

    Like

  2. The best ever article (Most Balanced I must say) on the on-going issue of code of conduct for social networking sites! You are the best with your words….I must tell you Agni🙂

    Like

  3. Well you basically voiced the opinion of most sane people in the country. Missed your abject sharp and blunt discourse though. Very diplomatic of you🙂

    Like

  4. I am afraid that you are mixing two issues- one that is an ideal situation where everyone is self regulated and other where aberrations exist and need to be tackled through external regulations.

    If we are in the ideal state, then we don’t need courts and criminal judicial system. But the fact is society has some elements who needs to be curbed for the greater harmony!

    That is as much true to Internet as to the real world outside it.

    Like

  5. I am afraid that you are mixing two issues- one that is an ideal situation where everyone is self regulated and other where aberrations exist and need to be tackled through external regulations.

    If we are in the ideal state, then we don’t need courts and criminal judicial system. But the fact is society has some elements who needs to be curbed for the greater harmony!

    That is as much true to Internet as to the real world outside it.Let us differentiate between genuine exercise of freedom of expression and misuse of the Net for abusive and defamatory character assassination!

    Like

  6. Ever heard of COICA? USA doesn’t have a totalitarian govt. either. I thought you supported the motion when people were writing “offensive” things about Sonia ji and Rahul.

    Like

  7. You really do moderate the comments on your post!! F*** u

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: